What We Do > Our Services
Healthy Women Project:
Report on the Healthy Women Project
The Purpose of the Project
In 2003, CRIL was selected to conduct a small, qualitative study aimed at increasing screening rates for breast and cervical cancer among women with self-identified physical disabilities. Our goal was to provide women with the tools and support they need to overcome the obstacles they face to screening, while tracking which activities motivated them the most. We set out to collect data, create materials and record lessons that will contribute to the effort to understand and improve healthcare access for women with disabilities.
Breast cancer screening includes the clinical breast exam, breast self-exams, and mammography. Cervical cancer screening includes pelvic exams, Pap smears and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing. Breast and cervical cancer screening increases early detection, reduces mortality, and improves outcomes for people diagnosed with cancer. It is essential for women 40 or older to receive regular screenings, as breast and cervical cancer continue to be among the leading causes of death for women.
Studies have shown women with physical disabilities are less likely than women without disabilities to participate in regular breast and cervical cancer screening.

Women with disabilities face many challenges to receiving screening, including:
- Inadequate access to facilities and equipment
- Difficulty positioning for exams
- Lack of provider knowledge and insensitivity to needs
- Lack of accessible transportation
- Lack of adequate health insurance
Project Preparation:
Once the project design was complete and approved, CRIL staff began creating materials, including surveys, consent forms, recruitment materials and a Provider Guide. CRIL staff also located and expanded upon an Accessible Transportation Guide for the region that included public and private transportation options.
We created the Provider Guide through a series of telephone interviews and site visits to measure accessibility according to strict criteria including proximity to public transportation, accessible parking, pathways, exam rooms, bathrooms and elevators, as well as accommodations for women who are deaf, have low-vision or use a service animal. Ultimately, it included 16 facilities in the region that provide mammograms and gynecological services to women with disabilities. Many have adjustable exams tables and equipment. Later, as the regional reach of the project was expanded, we created a supplement with 8 additional facilities.
Everyone who enrolled in the project was given these materials. In addition, CRIL staff provided the gynecological facilities included in the Provider Guide with a copy of Table Manners – The Gynecological Exam for Women with Developmental Disabilities and Other Functional Limitations.
The next step was to put together the workshop curriculum and peer-counseling guides. We aimed to create educational materials that would help women understand the importance of breast and cervical cancer screening and the risks of going without them. The result was a 50-plus-page, interactive curriculum and two peer guides, each more than 150 pages long. Sources included articles, books, videos and websites, as well as interviews with other researchers and women with disabilities.
Recruitment
CRIL set out to find 80-100 participants. Our criteria: Women, 40 or older, possessing a self-identified physical disability for two or more years, who had not had a mammogram in over a year or a Pap smear in over two years.
Recruitment, which included calls to women in CRIL’s database, mass mailings through local paratransit organizations, advertisements in local papers and newsletters, and trips to various health fairs and support groups, proved more difficult and time-consuming than expected. Some 360 phone calls led to 190 conversations with potential participants. About half, roughly 87, expressed interest in joining and were mailed enrollment materials. In the end, just over half of that group, 46 women, participated in the project from start to finish.
We divided the participants into three groups: the workshop group, the peer-counseling group, and the control group. All were given ‘before’ and ‘after’ surveys quizzing them on knowledge of breast and cervical cancer and prevention, attitudes towards screening and attitudes towards health care. We also gathered basic demographic data from the women.
The Interventions:
14 participants served as a control group, receiving materials by mail only.
16 women participated in peer-counseling over the telephone with the project coordinator, a woman with a disability. The sessions averaged 55 minutes. After building trust and learning about each woman and her disability, the peer-counselor presented basic information on cancer, risk factors and screening guidelines. From there, the sessions were consumer-driven and tailored to the specific barriers the women believed were keeping them from getting regular screenings.
Another 16 women attended an interactive workshop, led by CRIL staff members with disabilities and a registered nurse with experience working with women with disabilities. The workshop emphasized the early detection of breast and cervical cancer through regular screenings. We presented the material in a variety of fashions, including overheads, video clips, hand-outs and small and large group exercises.

The most popular part of the workshop was a creative learning tool created by CRIL staff to help women understand the importance of mammograms. Women created mock breasts from Play-doh and practiced finding different sized grains and beans hidden in the clay. The beans represent different sized tumors, those which can be found by your hand and those which can only be found by a mammogram.
What was the most helpful part of the workshop? "The beans in the Play-doh. A picture is worth more than a thousand words." – Workshop participant
Both interventions were led by women with disabilities, for women with disabilities. This proved to be crucial in motivating participants. Many women commented on what a difference it made to talk with someone who truly understood what they are going through:
"You could see that other people are having the same problem as you, so I didn’t feel afraid to say what I had to say." – Workshop participant
To measure the success of our interventions, we called each woman two months later to find out if she had made a screening appointment.
Project Findings
The project met and exceeded expectations. It showed that educating women with disabilities about cancer and encouraging them to make screening appointments is a successful venture. All three groups, including the control group, made great strides. Of the three groups, women from the workshop group proved to be most likely to seek out a screening appointment. For example, 94% of workshop participants were in compliance with mammogram screening guidelines by the end of the project, compared to 25% at the start of the project.

Despite the apparent difference between the workshop and the peer counseling, CRIL staff and data analysts ultimately concluded both interventions are potentially equally effective. While the workshop proved to be highly motivational for the women who could participate, many women were not able to attend, largely due to their disability. Once we accounted for those who did peer counseling because their mobility issues prevented them from attending the workshop, the success rates of the two interventions were not statistically different.
"I just wouldn’t have done it without somebody telling me... You know you need to do it, but you need that cheerleader on the side saying “go do it.” Now I understand a lot more what the causes of these cancers can be. I had a lot of myths and I thought I was safe because I wasn’t doing certain activities. Now I understand the risk factors better." – HWP peer counseling participant
What's obvious is this – both the workshops and the peer counseling are potent tools for empowering women with disabilities to overcome barriers to accessing health care. Our full report and data analysis are available to those seeking more information.
Looking to the Future
Mammograms and Pap smears are life-saving screenings that women with disabilities need to stay healthy. The Healthy Women Project shows that peer-driven education is a successful way to increase screening rates among women with physical disabilities. Having mailed all of the women a $25 stipend for their participation, CRIL is now offering a workshop to the women in the control group.
This pilot project can be easily replicated to improve the health of women with disabilities nationwide. Our complete report and user-friendly resources are available to other Independent Living Centers and community organizations seeking to increase screening rates in their communities. The data collected and lessons learned contribute to the knowledge and understanding of healthcare access and barriers for women with disabilities.
The Healthy Women Project was made possible through the generous grants and collaboration provided by the following:
- US Centers for Disease Control
- California Department of Health Services: EPIC (Epidemiology and Prevention for Injury Control Branch) Office of Disability and Health Services
- California State Department of Rehabilitation
- BHAWD - Breast Health Access for Women with Disabilities / Alta Bates Hospital
- The Women's Foundation of California
The Healthy Women Project was a success thanks to the following individuals and organizations.
All of the women with disabilities whose participation made this project possible and whose stories brought us valuable knowledge, as well as joy.
- CRIL staff and volunteers: Elizabeth Pazdral, Jackie Downing, Rose Hoban, Elisa Rossetti, Suzanne Vaughan, Angela Rodrigues, Karen Marshall, Marie Grube, Rose Coleman, Carol Raugust, and more.
- Our partner organizations and funding sources, listed previously.
- Roger Trent, Lisa Hershey, Galatea King, Jodi Keyserling, California Department of Health Services
- Joanne LaVoie, California State Department of Rehabilitation
- Joanne Thierry, Centers for Disease Control
- Kaela Milosevic and Christine Jayan, Better Health Foundation
- H. Stephen Kaye, UCSF Disability Statistics Center
- Nancy Freed, Flora Maiki, Ann Cuppolo-Freeman, Carol D’Onofrio, Breast Health Access for Women with Disabilities (BHAWD), Alta Bates
- Anita Shankar with Sheri Clinchard, Kaiser; and Lauren Howard, formerly of the NC Office on Disability and Health
- Linda Toms Barker, Berkeley Policy Associates
- Selma Abinader, Selma Abinader and Associates
- Lisa Maisels, Office of Health and Disability, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Mammography Access Project
- Pam Dickens, Karen Luken, North Carolina Office on Disability and Health
- Michael Chae, American Cancer Society, East Bay Metropolitan Unit
- Stefanie Cox, Gabey Marcus, Elgina Haymon, Disability Rights Advocates
- Everyone who helped with recruitment, including Janine Carlson, Wittenberg Manor; Eileen Cordova and everyone at Eden Housing; Joann Oliver and Isabelle Leduc, San Leandro Recreation and Human Services; Mary Rowlands, East Bay Paratransit; Cory LaVigne, LAVTA / WHEELS
- Ruth Young of Washington Hospital, Fremont, CA; Misty Woodring of Valley Care Imaging Center, Pleasanton, CA; and all the staff that welcomed us into their facilities.
- Everyone from Paratransit, including Nina (East Bay), Shawn Fong (Fremont), Victoria (Hayward), Pauline (WHEELS)
- The counselors and supervisors at the California Every Women Counts Hotline (800) 511-2300
- Marcia Finlayson, Univ. of Illinois, Chicago, Dept. of Occupational Therapy
- Kelly Wilmeth, Job Coach, Ohlone College Workability III Program
- Molly Savitz, UCSF School of Nursing
- Pam Priest-Naeve, Northern California Cancer Center
- Debbie Moore, Kaiser Fremont
- Brenda Premo, Center for Disability Issues and the Health Professions
- Laura Schopp, Univ. of Missouri Dept. of Health Psychology
- Victoria Champion, Indiana University School of Nursing
- Dr. Paul Devereux, Univ. of Nevada at Reno
- Heather Becker, University of Texas at Austin, School of Nursing
- Pat Ferdan, Alex Leviton, Sheri Clinchard, Fran Stevens, Janice Tizon
- Grace Schoeniger, writer and editor
- Jeremy Thornton, Jeremy Thornton Design
- Additional sources listed within our materials
- Anyone and everyone who helped but is not mentioned here

